normal human stomach antrum Search Results


98
ATCC human stomach normal epithelial cells
Human Stomach Normal Epithelial Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human stomach normal epithelial cells/product/ATCC
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human stomach normal epithelial cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Novus Biologicals normal human stomach antrum
CBS epimutations associate with CIMP in primary GCs. a Overlap of genes that are promoter hypermethylated and downregulated at the RNA level in the discovery GC cell line panel, <t>TCGA-stomach</t> adenocarcinoma [STAD] and Singapore [SG] cohorts ( β -value difference ≥ 0.3 and q -value < 0.05) [left panel]. Average promoter methylation β -values and gene expression of CBS gene in STAD according to CIMP subtypes (* P < 0.001, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test, each CIMP group vs. non-CIMP group) [right panel]. b Immunohistochemistry of CBS in a <t>normal</t> <t>human</t> stomach with black arrow indicating cytoplasmic staining in epithelial cells. Control sections were not treated with the primary antibody. c Summary of CBS staining in 66 cases of matched normal and gastric adenocarcinomas (* P < 0.05, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) [left panel] and an example of a matched normal vs. tumor case with a negative score [right panel]. d Summary of somatic and germline genetic alterations at CBS in STAD. PALP, pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme domain; CBS, cystathionine beta-synthase domain; aa, amino acid
Normal Human Stomach Antrum, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/normal human stomach antrum/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
normal human stomach antrum - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
BioChain Institute cancerous stomach
CBS epimutations associate with CIMP in primary GCs. a Overlap of genes that are promoter hypermethylated and downregulated at the RNA level in the discovery GC cell line panel, <t>TCGA-stomach</t> adenocarcinoma [STAD] and Singapore [SG] cohorts ( β -value difference ≥ 0.3 and q -value < 0.05) [left panel]. Average promoter methylation β -values and gene expression of CBS gene in STAD according to CIMP subtypes (* P < 0.001, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test, each CIMP group vs. non-CIMP group) [right panel]. b Immunohistochemistry of CBS in a <t>normal</t> <t>human</t> stomach with black arrow indicating cytoplasmic staining in epithelial cells. Control sections were not treated with the primary antibody. c Summary of CBS staining in 66 cases of matched normal and gastric adenocarcinomas (* P < 0.05, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) [left panel] and an example of a matched normal vs. tumor case with a negative score [right panel]. d Summary of somatic and germline genetic alterations at CBS in STAD. PALP, pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme domain; CBS, cystathionine beta-synthase domain; aa, amino acid
Cancerous Stomach, supplied by BioChain Institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cancerous stomach/product/BioChain Institute
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cancerous stomach - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
AMS Biotechnology total rna - human adult normal tissue: stomach
CBS epimutations associate with CIMP in primary GCs. a Overlap of genes that are promoter hypermethylated and downregulated at the RNA level in the discovery GC cell line panel, <t>TCGA-stomach</t> adenocarcinoma [STAD] and Singapore [SG] cohorts ( β -value difference ≥ 0.3 and q -value < 0.05) [left panel]. Average promoter methylation β -values and gene expression of CBS gene in STAD according to CIMP subtypes (* P < 0.001, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test, each CIMP group vs. non-CIMP group) [right panel]. b Immunohistochemistry of CBS in a <t>normal</t> <t>human</t> stomach with black arrow indicating cytoplasmic staining in epithelial cells. Control sections were not treated with the primary antibody. c Summary of CBS staining in 66 cases of matched normal and gastric adenocarcinomas (* P < 0.05, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) [left panel] and an example of a matched normal vs. tumor case with a negative score [right panel]. d Summary of somatic and germline genetic alterations at CBS in STAD. PALP, pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme domain; CBS, cystathionine beta-synthase domain; aa, amino acid
Total Rna Human Adult Normal Tissue: Stomach, supplied by AMS Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/total rna - human adult normal tissue: stomach/product/AMS Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
total rna - human adult normal tissue: stomach - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Novus Biologicals fundus tissue slides
CBS epimutations associate with CIMP in primary GCs. a Overlap of genes that are promoter hypermethylated and downregulated at the RNA level in the discovery GC cell line panel, <t>TCGA-stomach</t> adenocarcinoma [STAD] and Singapore [SG] cohorts ( β -value difference ≥ 0.3 and q -value < 0.05) [left panel]. Average promoter methylation β -values and gene expression of CBS gene in STAD according to CIMP subtypes (* P < 0.001, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test, each CIMP group vs. non-CIMP group) [right panel]. b Immunohistochemistry of CBS in a <t>normal</t> <t>human</t> stomach with black arrow indicating cytoplasmic staining in epithelial cells. Control sections were not treated with the primary antibody. c Summary of CBS staining in 66 cases of matched normal and gastric adenocarcinomas (* P < 0.05, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) [left panel] and an example of a matched normal vs. tumor case with a negative score [right panel]. d Summary of somatic and germline genetic alterations at CBS in STAD. PALP, pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme domain; CBS, cystathionine beta-synthase domain; aa, amino acid
Fundus Tissue Slides, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fundus tissue slides/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fundus tissue slides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Novus Biologicals human stomach tissue
CBS epimutations associate with CIMP in primary GCs. a Overlap of genes that are promoter hypermethylated and downregulated at the RNA level in the discovery GC cell line panel, <t>TCGA-stomach</t> adenocarcinoma [STAD] and Singapore [SG] cohorts ( β -value difference ≥ 0.3 and q -value < 0.05) [left panel]. Average promoter methylation β -values and gene expression of CBS gene in STAD according to CIMP subtypes (* P < 0.001, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test, each CIMP group vs. non-CIMP group) [right panel]. b Immunohistochemistry of CBS in a <t>normal</t> <t>human</t> stomach with black arrow indicating cytoplasmic staining in epithelial cells. Control sections were not treated with the primary antibody. c Summary of CBS staining in 66 cases of matched normal and gastric adenocarcinomas (* P < 0.05, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) [left panel] and an example of a matched normal vs. tumor case with a negative score [right panel]. d Summary of somatic and germline genetic alterations at CBS in STAD. PALP, pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme domain; CBS, cystathionine beta-synthase domain; aa, amino acid
Human Stomach Tissue, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human stomach tissue/product/Novus Biologicals
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human stomach tissue - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
BioChain Institute cdna
CBS epimutations associate with CIMP in primary GCs. a Overlap of genes that are promoter hypermethylated and downregulated at the RNA level in the discovery GC cell line panel, <t>TCGA-stomach</t> adenocarcinoma [STAD] and Singapore [SG] cohorts ( β -value difference ≥ 0.3 and q -value < 0.05) [left panel]. Average promoter methylation β -values and gene expression of CBS gene in STAD according to CIMP subtypes (* P < 0.001, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test, each CIMP group vs. non-CIMP group) [right panel]. b Immunohistochemistry of CBS in a <t>normal</t> <t>human</t> stomach with black arrow indicating cytoplasmic staining in epithelial cells. Control sections were not treated with the primary antibody. c Summary of CBS staining in 66 cases of matched normal and gastric adenocarcinomas (* P < 0.05, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) [left panel] and an example of a matched normal vs. tumor case with a negative score [right panel]. d Summary of somatic and germline genetic alterations at CBS in STAD. PALP, pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme domain; CBS, cystathionine beta-synthase domain; aa, amino acid
Cdna, supplied by BioChain Institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdna/product/BioChain Institute
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
TaKaRa tumor cdna
, Expression of CDO1 in cell lines was examined by RT-PCR <t>or</t> <t>qRT-PCR</t> analyses. m, mock treatment. a, 5-Aza-dC treatment (5 µM for three days). β-actin was used as a loading control. Methylation status of CDO1 promoter in each cell line was examined and indicated as M for methylation, U for unmethylation, and M/U for co-existence of methylated and unmethylated alleles. CDO1 was completely methylated in all cancer cell lines since only cytosine peaks were observed in CpGs sequenced (100% methylation) while it was not methylated in HEK293 since only thymidine peaks were observed (0% methylation). CDO1 was partially methylated in MCF-12A since both methylated and unmethylated alleles were observed in 10 CpGs of the CDO1 promoters examined. When a cytosine peak were compared with a thymidine peak in each CpG of the 10 CpGs, cytosine peaks were dominant (methylated), but since these “methylated CpGs” were found in less than 50% of total CpGs (10/34), it was considered as “methylation-negative” according to the criteria described in . B . qRT-PCR was performed in cDNAs derived from patients with colon, breast, esophagus, bladder and stomach cancer (T) and patients without cancer (NN) (upper). Relative expression (Fold) was calculated by comparing the ratios of mRNA expression of CDO1 to an internal control gene, β-actin. The CDO1 expression level was determined in 10 lung cancer patients and 10 patients without cancer (lower). 2?-()*100, the expression of CDO1 relative to β-actin calculated based on the threshold cycle (C t ) as 2 −ΔCt (ΔCt = C t, CDO1 - C t,β-actin ). Experiments were done in duplicate, and values indicate means ± SD. *, P<0.05 in T- test. C , The CDO1 expression level was examined in five pairs (A ∼ E) of matched <t>cDNA</t> prepared from patients with colon and lung cancer. PT, primary tumor; PN, matched normal tissues.
Tumor Cdna, supplied by TaKaRa, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tumor cdna/product/TaKaRa
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tumor cdna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
AMS Biotechnology stomach
, Expression of CDO1 in cell lines was examined by RT-PCR <t>or</t> <t>qRT-PCR</t> analyses. m, mock treatment. a, 5-Aza-dC treatment (5 µM for three days). β-actin was used as a loading control. Methylation status of CDO1 promoter in each cell line was examined and indicated as M for methylation, U for unmethylation, and M/U for co-existence of methylated and unmethylated alleles. CDO1 was completely methylated in all cancer cell lines since only cytosine peaks were observed in CpGs sequenced (100% methylation) while it was not methylated in HEK293 since only thymidine peaks were observed (0% methylation). CDO1 was partially methylated in MCF-12A since both methylated and unmethylated alleles were observed in 10 CpGs of the CDO1 promoters examined. When a cytosine peak were compared with a thymidine peak in each CpG of the 10 CpGs, cytosine peaks were dominant (methylated), but since these “methylated CpGs” were found in less than 50% of total CpGs (10/34), it was considered as “methylation-negative” according to the criteria described in . B . qRT-PCR was performed in cDNAs derived from patients with colon, breast, esophagus, bladder and stomach cancer (T) and patients without cancer (NN) (upper). Relative expression (Fold) was calculated by comparing the ratios of mRNA expression of CDO1 to an internal control gene, β-actin. The CDO1 expression level was determined in 10 lung cancer patients and 10 patients without cancer (lower). 2?-()*100, the expression of CDO1 relative to β-actin calculated based on the threshold cycle (C t ) as 2 −ΔCt (ΔCt = C t, CDO1 - C t,β-actin ). Experiments were done in duplicate, and values indicate means ± SD. *, P<0.05 in T- test. C , The CDO1 expression level was examined in five pairs (A ∼ E) of matched <t>cDNA</t> prepared from patients with colon and lung cancer. PT, primary tumor; PN, matched normal tissues.
Stomach, supplied by AMS Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/stomach/product/AMS Biotechnology
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
stomach - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC by nc nd license
, Expression of CDO1 in cell lines was examined by RT-PCR <t>or</t> <t>qRT-PCR</t> analyses. m, mock treatment. a, 5-Aza-dC treatment (5 µM for three days). β-actin was used as a loading control. Methylation status of CDO1 promoter in each cell line was examined and indicated as M for methylation, U for unmethylation, and M/U for co-existence of methylated and unmethylated alleles. CDO1 was completely methylated in all cancer cell lines since only cytosine peaks were observed in CpGs sequenced (100% methylation) while it was not methylated in HEK293 since only thymidine peaks were observed (0% methylation). CDO1 was partially methylated in MCF-12A since both methylated and unmethylated alleles were observed in 10 CpGs of the CDO1 promoters examined. When a cytosine peak were compared with a thymidine peak in each CpG of the 10 CpGs, cytosine peaks were dominant (methylated), but since these “methylated CpGs” were found in less than 50% of total CpGs (10/34), it was considered as “methylation-negative” according to the criteria described in . B . qRT-PCR was performed in cDNAs derived from patients with colon, breast, esophagus, bladder and stomach cancer (T) and patients without cancer (NN) (upper). Relative expression (Fold) was calculated by comparing the ratios of mRNA expression of CDO1 to an internal control gene, β-actin. The CDO1 expression level was determined in 10 lung cancer patients and 10 patients without cancer (lower). 2?-()*100, the expression of CDO1 relative to β-actin calculated based on the threshold cycle (C t ) as 2 −ΔCt (ΔCt = C t, CDO1 - C t,β-actin ). Experiments were done in duplicate, and values indicate means ± SD. *, P<0.05 in T- test. C , The CDO1 expression level was examined in five pairs (A ∼ E) of matched <t>cDNA</t> prepared from patients with colon and lung cancer. PT, primary tumor; PN, matched normal tissues.
By Nc Nd License, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/by nc nd license/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
by nc nd license - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BioChain Institute cdnas from 14 normal human tissues
, Expression of CDO1 in cell lines was examined by RT-PCR <t>or</t> <t>qRT-PCR</t> analyses. m, mock treatment. a, 5-Aza-dC treatment (5 µM for three days). β-actin was used as a loading control. Methylation status of CDO1 promoter in each cell line was examined and indicated as M for methylation, U for unmethylation, and M/U for co-existence of methylated and unmethylated alleles. CDO1 was completely methylated in all cancer cell lines since only cytosine peaks were observed in CpGs sequenced (100% methylation) while it was not methylated in HEK293 since only thymidine peaks were observed (0% methylation). CDO1 was partially methylated in MCF-12A since both methylated and unmethylated alleles were observed in 10 CpGs of the CDO1 promoters examined. When a cytosine peak were compared with a thymidine peak in each CpG of the 10 CpGs, cytosine peaks were dominant (methylated), but since these “methylated CpGs” were found in less than 50% of total CpGs (10/34), it was considered as “methylation-negative” according to the criteria described in . B . qRT-PCR was performed in cDNAs derived from patients with colon, breast, esophagus, bladder and stomach cancer (T) and patients without cancer (NN) (upper). Relative expression (Fold) was calculated by comparing the ratios of mRNA expression of CDO1 to an internal control gene, β-actin. The CDO1 expression level was determined in 10 lung cancer patients and 10 patients without cancer (lower). 2?-()*100, the expression of CDO1 relative to β-actin calculated based on the threshold cycle (C t ) as 2 −ΔCt (ΔCt = C t, CDO1 - C t,β-actin ). Experiments were done in duplicate, and values indicate means ± SD. *, P<0.05 in T- test. C , The CDO1 expression level was examined in five pairs (A ∼ E) of matched <t>cDNA</t> prepared from patients with colon and lung cancer. PT, primary tumor; PN, matched normal tissues.
Cdnas From 14 Normal Human Tissues, supplied by BioChain Institute, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cdnas from 14 normal human tissues/product/BioChain Institute
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdnas from 14 normal human tissues - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


CBS epimutations associate with CIMP in primary GCs. a Overlap of genes that are promoter hypermethylated and downregulated at the RNA level in the discovery GC cell line panel, TCGA-stomach adenocarcinoma [STAD] and Singapore [SG] cohorts ( β -value difference ≥ 0.3 and q -value < 0.05) [left panel]. Average promoter methylation β -values and gene expression of CBS gene in STAD according to CIMP subtypes (* P < 0.001, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test, each CIMP group vs. non-CIMP group) [right panel]. b Immunohistochemistry of CBS in a normal human stomach with black arrow indicating cytoplasmic staining in epithelial cells. Control sections were not treated with the primary antibody. c Summary of CBS staining in 66 cases of matched normal and gastric adenocarcinomas (* P < 0.05, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) [left panel] and an example of a matched normal vs. tumor case with a negative score [right panel]. d Summary of somatic and germline genetic alterations at CBS in STAD. PALP, pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme domain; CBS, cystathionine beta-synthase domain; aa, amino acid

Journal: Genome Biology

Article Title: Highly recurrent CBS epimutations in gastric cancer CpG island methylator phenotypes and inflammation

doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02375-2

Figure Lengend Snippet: CBS epimutations associate with CIMP in primary GCs. a Overlap of genes that are promoter hypermethylated and downregulated at the RNA level in the discovery GC cell line panel, TCGA-stomach adenocarcinoma [STAD] and Singapore [SG] cohorts ( β -value difference ≥ 0.3 and q -value < 0.05) [left panel]. Average promoter methylation β -values and gene expression of CBS gene in STAD according to CIMP subtypes (* P < 0.001, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test, each CIMP group vs. non-CIMP group) [right panel]. b Immunohistochemistry of CBS in a normal human stomach with black arrow indicating cytoplasmic staining in epithelial cells. Control sections were not treated with the primary antibody. c Summary of CBS staining in 66 cases of matched normal and gastric adenocarcinomas (* P < 0.05, two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) [left panel] and an example of a matched normal vs. tumor case with a negative score [right panel]. d Summary of somatic and germline genetic alterations at CBS in STAD. PALP, pyridoxal-phosphate dependent enzyme domain; CBS, cystathionine beta-synthase domain; aa, amino acid

Article Snippet: Normal human stomach antrum and fundus tissue slides were purchased from Novus Biologicals (NBP2-30203, NBP2-30204).

Techniques: Methylation, Gene Expression, Two Tailed Test, Immunohistochemistry, Staining, Control

, Expression of CDO1 in cell lines was examined by RT-PCR or qRT-PCR analyses. m, mock treatment. a, 5-Aza-dC treatment (5 µM for three days). β-actin was used as a loading control. Methylation status of CDO1 promoter in each cell line was examined and indicated as M for methylation, U for unmethylation, and M/U for co-existence of methylated and unmethylated alleles. CDO1 was completely methylated in all cancer cell lines since only cytosine peaks were observed in CpGs sequenced (100% methylation) while it was not methylated in HEK293 since only thymidine peaks were observed (0% methylation). CDO1 was partially methylated in MCF-12A since both methylated and unmethylated alleles were observed in 10 CpGs of the CDO1 promoters examined. When a cytosine peak were compared with a thymidine peak in each CpG of the 10 CpGs, cytosine peaks were dominant (methylated), but since these “methylated CpGs” were found in less than 50% of total CpGs (10/34), it was considered as “methylation-negative” according to the criteria described in . B . qRT-PCR was performed in cDNAs derived from patients with colon, breast, esophagus, bladder and stomach cancer (T) and patients without cancer (NN) (upper). Relative expression (Fold) was calculated by comparing the ratios of mRNA expression of CDO1 to an internal control gene, β-actin. The CDO1 expression level was determined in 10 lung cancer patients and 10 patients without cancer (lower). 2?-()*100, the expression of CDO1 relative to β-actin calculated based on the threshold cycle (C t ) as 2 −ΔCt (ΔCt = C t, CDO1 - C t,β-actin ). Experiments were done in duplicate, and values indicate means ± SD. *, P<0.05 in T- test. C , The CDO1 expression level was examined in five pairs (A ∼ E) of matched cDNA prepared from patients with colon and lung cancer. PT, primary tumor; PN, matched normal tissues.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Cysteine Dioxygenase 1 Is a Tumor Suppressor Gene Silenced by Promoter Methylation in Multiple Human Cancers

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044951

Figure Lengend Snippet: , Expression of CDO1 in cell lines was examined by RT-PCR or qRT-PCR analyses. m, mock treatment. a, 5-Aza-dC treatment (5 µM for three days). β-actin was used as a loading control. Methylation status of CDO1 promoter in each cell line was examined and indicated as M for methylation, U for unmethylation, and M/U for co-existence of methylated and unmethylated alleles. CDO1 was completely methylated in all cancer cell lines since only cytosine peaks were observed in CpGs sequenced (100% methylation) while it was not methylated in HEK293 since only thymidine peaks were observed (0% methylation). CDO1 was partially methylated in MCF-12A since both methylated and unmethylated alleles were observed in 10 CpGs of the CDO1 promoters examined. When a cytosine peak were compared with a thymidine peak in each CpG of the 10 CpGs, cytosine peaks were dominant (methylated), but since these “methylated CpGs” were found in less than 50% of total CpGs (10/34), it was considered as “methylation-negative” according to the criteria described in . B . qRT-PCR was performed in cDNAs derived from patients with colon, breast, esophagus, bladder and stomach cancer (T) and patients without cancer (NN) (upper). Relative expression (Fold) was calculated by comparing the ratios of mRNA expression of CDO1 to an internal control gene, β-actin. The CDO1 expression level was determined in 10 lung cancer patients and 10 patients without cancer (lower). 2?-()*100, the expression of CDO1 relative to β-actin calculated based on the threshold cycle (C t ) as 2 −ΔCt (ΔCt = C t, CDO1 - C t,β-actin ). Experiments were done in duplicate, and values indicate means ± SD. *, P<0.05 in T- test. C , The CDO1 expression level was examined in five pairs (A ∼ E) of matched cDNA prepared from patients with colon and lung cancer. PT, primary tumor; PN, matched normal tissues.

Article Snippet: For the qRT-PCR analysis, five matched normal and tumor cDNA (A ∼ E) were purchased from Clontech Laboratories, Inc. (Mountain View, CA). cDNA panels of human normal (NN) and cancer tissue (T) derived from colon, breast, esophagus, bladder and stomach were purchased from BioChain Institute, Inc. (Hayward, CA).

Techniques: Expressing, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction, Quantitative RT-PCR, Control, Methylation, Derivative Assay